View Single Post
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 08-06-2003, 10:54 PM
Zylark is offline  
Zylark has a reputation above and beyondZylark has a reputation above and beyondZylark has a reputation above and beyondZylark has a reputation above and beyondZylark has a reputation above and beyondZylark has a reputation above and beyondZylark has a reputation above and beyondZylark has a reputation above and beyondZylark has a reputation above and beyondZylark has a reputation above and beyondZylark has a reputation above and beyond
Zylark
Old School Stoner
Zylark's Avatar
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Norway, on the Westside where it rains perpetually.
Posts: 2,951
i read this thing on space.com as well, and it's quite mindboggling. basically what most think of time is a successioin of events the progression of which are dictated by the flow of time as a series of instances.

lynd says this is wrong. time should not be thought of this way. and that is the thing that get's me confused. there are no instances in time. space (matter, energy) and time is really the same, in the sense that if there were no time, space could not exist *and* all of space are not dictated by time. as i said, i find it very confusing, and need to read the whole paper and some rewievs on it before i can fully understand his ideas. very interesting thoughts tho.
__________________
Reply With Quote