View Single Post
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 01-15-2008, 08:19 PM
Blazin'Talon is offline  
Blazin'Talon has much to be proud ofBlazin'Talon has much to be proud ofBlazin'Talon has much to be proud ofBlazin'Talon has much to be proud ofBlazin'Talon has much to be proud ofBlazin'Talon has much to be proud ofBlazin'Talon has much to be proud ofBlazin'Talon has much to be proud ofBlazin'Talon has much to be proud ofBlazin'Talon has much to be proud of
Blazin'Talon
Maybe just nothing
Blazin'Talon's Avatar
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Alberta!
Posts: 2,301
Quote:
Originally Posted by djnecro View Post
What about the proceeds from crime act? I'm not sure if we have something similar here in Canada, but according to the courts, that $600,000 should be considered proceeds from a crime and the persons who received the money should also be prosecuted appropriately...


Okay, perhaps my bong hit was a little too big, but I am unable to form coherent arguments in this case... it makes so little sense, it's.... .. just wrong...
The government would never prosecute itself. They accepted the money with the full disclosure of where it came from. In doing that they were saying that it is an acceptable way to earn money (as long as you pay them theirs).

I think he was fined once for a couple hundred dollars. That's how serious his crime was.

The DEA is a fucking joke. It makes me sick.
__________________
"He says 'Baby, I don't wanna die today'
You say 'So long man, it's too late'"
- 54-40
  Reply With Quote