Quote:
Originally Posted by g0pher
And what is your arguement against my theory about light?
|
Not just light, your understanding of planets too. You said:
Quote:
Originally Posted by g0pher
A black hole can't exist because it defies all logic. You can't have a point that 'sucks up' every single thing in it's vicinity, including light.
|
You can. It's super-dense, has massive gravity and will attract everything, including light. Everything of any mass bends light towards itself, not just black holes.
Quote:
Originally Posted by g0pher
That's impossible because light is an expression of existence.
|
No it's not. Light is both a particle and a wave form.
Quote:
Originally Posted by g0pher
It is everywhere. As an example: even inside of a hermetically sealed steel box, there is light, it's just that our eyes can't pick it up.
|
No there isn't. Without a light source there are no photons within the box.
Quote:
Originally Posted by g0pher
Basically it's just a matter of the size of a body that determines the intensity of light. Since stars are the largest objects in the universe, they produce the most light. Next would come gaseous planets orbiting stars. You can see jupiter and mistake it for a large star in the sky when it's lined up with the earth.
|
What you're saying above is that Jupiter is a light source. It isn't, Jupiter reflects the light of the sun in the same way that the moon does, that's why it seems to shine.
Quote:
Originally Posted by g0pher
The event horizon is supposed to mark a boundary beyond which nothing can escape a black hole's gravity. According to the general theory of relativity, even light is trapped inside the horizon, and no information about what fell into the hole can ever escape. Information seems to fall out of the universe.
|
No again. Hawking Radiation or something very similar leaks out.
Quote:
Originally Posted by g0pher
Black Holes are just staples of science fiction, nothing more. It's a near certainty that black holes don't exist, even Einstein did'nt believe in them.
|
Main question though - why would the entire scientific community falisify the existence of the black holes they've already found? Why would their discovery in tens of galaxies be a common lie throughout every branch of cosmolgy? It's one thing to say that black holes may not exist, I can live with that, but calling it a 'Bg Hoax Theory'? Why the need for it to be a big conspiracy? Why dramatise it?
What you're talking about was posted here, it's the work of just one scientist and the article goes on to say what others think about his theory:
"...
http://forum.grasscity.com/spiritual...maybe-not.html
"... "I strongly disagree," says Nobel laureate Gerard 't Hooft of Utrecht University in the Netherlands. "The process he describes can in no way produce enough radiation to make a black hole disappear as quickly as he is suggesting." The horizon forms long before the hole can evaporate, 't Hooft told New Scientist.
Lab testSteve Giddings of the University of California in Santa Barbara, US, is also sceptical. "Well-understood findings apparently conflict with their picture," he told New Scientist. "To my knowledge, there hasn't been an attempt to understand how they are getting results that differ from these calculations, which would be an important step to understanding if this is a solid result."...."
MelT