[cannabis]

Originally Posted by fearthebug

however, i could counter with a few statements about debunking beliefs.

1. how would you accept these fossils as fact since it shows two different types beings living together instead of changing into the other? the bible says there was adam and eve. but then again, god killed everyone except for moses and all the animals, so we really don't descend from adam and eve. we're the "children of moses"

2. i thought that fossils were put here by the devil as a practical joke on all humans?



i'll have to read the 2nd part later. i did see answersingenesis being referenced, so i might not read it.

lol not surprising that instead of forming a legitimate argument you rather attempt to debunk Christianity. And you didn't even read the entire article...how sad
And above you claimed that I was grouping evolutionist into the same group, yet you did the same in that post in suggesting that all Christians disregard fossils as empirical evidence...I think it's safe to say every single Christian doesn't consider that.

Originally Posted by Azimuthal

The idea is that one group could splinter into two, carry out some natural change to suit their differing environments, and continue on living. This does not contradict evolution at all

Don't get me wrong Azimuthal, I'm not attempting to debunk the theory as a whole. I'm just pointing out flaws.

Originally Posted by metalstonerking

I really dont wnat to sound like an asshole, but...

This is the stupidest fucking argument against evolution Ive ever witnessed.

No offense dude, but claiming that without forming an actual argument is a pretty fucking ignorant way to respond.

"Hey guys, know the scientific method?"
"...yeah..?"
"Well, get this: EVOLUTION IS MAKING USE OF IT!"
"...ok..."
"DONT YOU UNDERSTAND ITS FAKE AHHHHHHH JESUS RULES!!!!!!!!!"

As I posted elsewhere, I'm familiar with the scientific method and I'm not entirely against Evolution. That is a pathetic attempt of making me appear delusional man.

No shit it changes. Whereas we had Freudian psychology, we now have psychiatry/neuroscience. Thus: BRAIN SCIENCE. IS. A. MYTH.

sure but how well developed is neuroscience? People make it appear as every aspect of the brain is completely understood. And that's clearly not the case when brain disorders and diseases continue to remain uncured and questioned about. And new research and information is continuously being discovered regarding the brain and neurology.

Originally Posted by BMactoker

For someone opposed to evolutionary theory cannabis, you certainly picked an odd way to argue against it.

Again, I'm not completely opposed to evolutionary theory, how many times do i have to repeat myself? you people automatically assume whenever someone questions a part of the theory that individual is skeptical of the whole of evolution. And why? Because you're faithful that evolution is all truth.

Originally Posted by skywalker

cannabis, the fact that they're making revisions says that they're concerned with accounting for every little detail and making sure the theory is as accurate as possible (which is more than I can say for some other group of people) That's how science works. Even Einstein didn't formulate his theory of relativity at once. It takes time to come up with that stuff, and in the case of evolution, something that has to do with every single living organism on the entire planet, you'd think it would be actually a difficult thing to get right on the first try... give Darwin a break. He's done far more than all of us here put together.. and he did it in the 19th century. How likely is it that a theory formulated in his time, as opposed to today with all our computers and supercomputers can go perfectly unchallenged? Darwin was good, but not that good.

I understand where you're coming from bro, but evolutionist make it appear as the theory is the as all end all facts of the universe and it totally debunks all religion and opposing theories indefinantly. And that's false.