|
If you had read the rest of that, you'd see that my statement came with evidence to support it. Stating that somone is a fool hardly provides sufficient knowledge to the receiver of the comment to come back with the same statement. As I said in the quoted post, you know absolutely nothing about me that could lead you to believe I'm a fool. I've gained insight into your (quite avoidant and selective) personality through the posts in this thread. I have not presented any beliefs of my own other than rational skepticism. Nothing I've said in my posts gives you any provocation to call me a fool. On the other hand, everything you've said here gives me more than enough cause to do the same to you.
Staying on topic, I'd like you to try to support your use of the internet to spread your idea of non-communication. The whole thing is quite hypocritical and self-absorbed in my opinion.
Last edited by Perception; 03-11-2007 at 02:55 PM.
Reason: Grammatical errors
|