lol, people keep misunderstanding me...
Quote:
|
through selective breeding or through natural selection, are aspects of evolution.
|
exactly... they're aspects of evolution. not evolution itself. just because you cross a white flower with a red flower and get a pink flower, doesn't mean that the pink flower evolved. it just means that the flowers DNA got mixed up to create another color. i know there's more to it than that... i'm just giving a simplified explaination.
the evolution i'm referring to when i say i don't believe in it, is the evolution that requires the addition of extra DNA to make the change. thus changing how many chromosomes are located in the cell, etc... all that stuff that has to happen in order to make a single celled organism turn into a human being. DNA doesn't just appear out of nowhere. by the way digit... i noticed you didn't respond to my other post regarding DNA just coming outta thin air.
and the point i was trying to make with the ark was that science has shown that it was possible. just like the big bang and evolution, it's still just a THEORY. i wasn't saying it definately happened the way the pentagon said it... just saying that scientifically speaking, the flood was possible... and that's all i'll post about the flood.
about those half-species... if evolution happened, and there were all these fish trying to go on land to become amphibians and reptiles (etc) there should be a lot more of them than the ones who actually made it... 'cause the half species still weren't equipped to live in their new environments and woulda died when they left their other one. thus making an abundance of these half-species fossils.
hey zylark, don't think i've forgotten about the gospels thing... i haven't had much time to do any reading, and might not for a while. don't worry though, i'll have a response for that as soon as i can get more time to do some reading. and also, a church that's both charasmatic and fundamental is impossible. charasmatic christian churches preach loads of false doctrine (ie. speaking in tongues, that you can lose your salvation, etc.). fundamental churches take it to the basics.
i just have to laugh at ubik's last response. no offence or anything... here's why i laughed.
Quote:
|
and have you ever even considered the option that bible is wrong? no because "you're so deeply commited to believe bible.
|
a brief history. from as far back as i can remember until i was 15 i was atheist and HATED church and everything that had to do with it. at the age of 15 i got into paganism... was pretty intense, and trust me, it's NOT fake... then i started going to church. thought i was saved for 3 years, then just this summer realized i wasn't. i finally accepted salvation into my heart and not just my mind... so, did i ever consider the Bible to be wrong? yeah! but after seeing so much evidence of it being right i changed my mind. i've seen what God can do in people's lives... and that's one thing you CAN'T deny. no matter how hard you try, you can NEVER deny a changed life.
see, i believe what i believe because it's impossible for me not to. after the things i've seen and experienced there's no possible way that i could ever think what i'm believing is wrong. people can tell me all they want that the Bible is wrong, science says this, science says that, or whatever. but i can promise, had any one of you been in my shoes for the last 3 years, you wouldn't beable to deny the Bible either.