View Single Post
  #44 (permalink)  
Old 06-27-2006, 09:13 PM
Shouse1018 is offline  
Shouse1018 has much to be proud ofShouse1018 has much to be proud ofShouse1018 has much to be proud ofShouse1018 has much to be proud ofShouse1018 has much to be proud ofShouse1018 has much to be proud ofShouse1018 has much to be proud ofShouse1018 has much to be proud of
Shouse1018
HooKedOnChronic
Shouse1018's Avatar
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: GA
Posts: 839
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheHempress
But Shouse, one of your main arguments for man+woman marriage was reproduction. What about all these old widows and widowers remarrying when they are in their 60's, 70's, 80's? They're way too old for reproducing so they shouldn't be allowed to marry either, don't you agree? And if you're already married and not producing children, what the hell did you get married for? Do you see what I mean? If you're trying to make an argument for man+woman marriage stay away from the reproduction issue. It really doesn't help your case.
You said it yourself. Widowers. They fulfilled their promise!

Why shouldn't an Old man and an Old woman be able to get married? It's natural.

Look at the extreme that you take this issue. I think the Reproduction issue

is the Best defence! You can't use arguments of AGE and/or someone with

a defect that doesn't allow them to reproduce as an argument for why Gay marriages

should be allowed. That's just rediculous.

Look at the Male and Female body. You put the two tegether and it fits together

like two pieces of a puzzle. Now, Take a man and a man and put them together,

now you have two pieces that you force together that don't fit. Now the entire puzzle

is messed up because of the One wrong fit.
  Reply With Quote